"At least one person in the United States, Barack Obama, seemed to recognize that the objective of terrorism is to promote terror and sought to defuse that effort by handling the threat with the proportionality and common sense that has long been missing from U.S. counterterrorism strategy."
Instead, Republicans (especially, but not exclusively) decide to respond to terrorism by screaming bloody murder that we are "all going to die." Which is exactly what the terrorist wants, right? Reminds me of the Republican freak-out over moving Gitmo detainees to American jails. Listening to them, you would think these guys are 7 feet tall with super-powers.
When we lose our values, or our minds in response to terrorism, they win. That seems rather obvious, but not to those wanting to make political hay.
1 comment:
Fareed Zakaria makes the same argument much better than I could. I know you say not exclusively, but I am interested in Democrats that aren't freaking out over this thing. Certainly not Dianne Feinstein who suggested that, "I'd rather overreact than underreact." Obama seems to be taking a calm and reasoned approach. I won't say the same for the Democratically dominated Congress.
Post a Comment