May 31, 2008

Sigh. The Frat Boy President thing is really, really, really tired

As Jon Stewart noted the other day, had Bush not screwed everything up, images like this would seem rather charming.



As it is, it seems incredibly in poor taste and juvenile. After all, he has sent some 4,000 of these young service men and women to die for what his own former press secretary admits was a mistake. I have never asked that he spend his time in sackcloth and ashes (though spending a little time acting competently would be nice), but at least a little gravitas would be appreciated. Oh, I forgot, he did give up golf.

More pictures here.

America the Stupid

Well, not everyone, but those like Michelle Malkin who think a scarf=support for terrorism. Just when you think the right wingers could not get more ridiculous, this successful campaign by an unbelievably stupid person actually forces Dunkin Donuts to pull the ad.

Over at Kos, Hunter suggests that the terrorists should take this lesson to heart:
Why stop at scarves, after all? If Islamic militants wished to truly damage America, they should make pants a symbol of their jihad. All of conservative America would immediately go patriotically pantsless, and the collective loss of American appetites would render the entire nation weak and anemic and ripe for takeover.
Given stupid people like Malkin and others, this might just work.

May 29, 2008

McSweeney's First Drafts of the Parables of Jesus.

Some very funny stuff.

We are a Christian nation, so sit down and shut up

Two-Headed Blog notices this story about a California car dealership running this ad:
"“Did you know that there are people in this country who want prayer out of schools, “Under God” out of the Pledge, and “In God We Trust” to be taken off our money?

“But did you know that 86 percent of Americans say they believe in God? Now, since we all know that 86 out of every 100 of us are Christians who believe in God, we at Kieffe and Sons Ford wonder why we don’t just tell the other 14 percent to sit down and shut up."

The dealership apologized for the ad written by an Oklahoma firm (yay us), but the fact that this is out there is just disturbing.

Corporate media

A rather shocking admission about how our corporate media works:
"JESSICA YELLIN, CNN CONGRESSIONAL CORRESPONDENT: I wouldn't go that far.

I think the press corps dropped the ball at the beginning. When the lead-up to the war began, the press corps was under enormous pressure from corporate executives, frankly, to make sure that this was a war that was presented in a way that was consistent with the patriotic fever in the nation and the president's high approval ratings.

And my own experience at the White House was that, the higher the president's approval ratings, the more pressure I had from news executives -- and I was not at this network at the time -- but the more pressure I had from news executives to put on positive stories about the president.

I think, over time...

(CROSSTALK)

COOPER: You had pressure from news executives to put on positive stories about the president?

YELLIN: Not in that exact -- they wouldn't say it in that way, but they would edit my pieces. They would push me in different directions. They would turn down stories that were more critical and try to put on pieces that were more positive, yes. That was my experience."
This is what many have suggested is the problem with the so-called "liberal media." Instead of being biased ideologically, they are biased toward what they think will sell.

McClellan--the problem is the system?

Listened to McClellan on NPR this morning and that seems to be his explanation. Or perhaps he is trying to pull his punch on the President, but he seems to want it both ways.

I am sure the system is broken, but this administration made it worse, and clearly lied to all of us.
"I don't think it was intentional or deliberate," McClellan says. "What happened here was we got caught up in the very thing the president campaigned against when he was first running for president back in 2000 – the destructive, partisan tone in Washington."
Of course it was deliberate. Even according to McClellan, Bush and his people knew that the American people would not buy a war based on some vague notion of transforming the Middle East, so they emphasized WMD and just ignored any intelligence that didn't fit their argument. Of course it was deliberate.

May 28, 2008

McClellan admits "liberal media" was right

And the war was a mistake.
“If anything, the national press corps was probably too deferential to the White House and to the administration in regard to the most important decision facing the nation during my years in Washington, the choice over whether to go to war in Iraq.

“The collapse of the administration’s rationales for war, which became apparent months after our invasion, should never have come as such a surprise. … In this case, the ‘liberal media’ didn’t live up to its reputation. If it had, the country would have been better served.”


Sully's take:
We're not talking mistakes here; we're talking about a deliberate shading of the truth to hide the real motivation for risking the lives of thousands of soldiers and hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians



If this is true, if the president intentionally ignored data refuting the existence of Saddam's WMDs, he should be impeached.

May 27, 2008

Political trends

Via Sully, news that Mitch McConnell is in a tight race. Lot of Republicans say they will vote for McCain, but not McConnell. Also, and I don't remember where I saw this, but looked like Al Franken was very close to Coleman in Minnesota--and that is surprising.

****

Also from Sully, this quote on the problem facing McCain.
"One of the main reasons John McCain is facing such an tough job today is that we are now in the sixth year of a war that the president of his own party started by mistake. That's a major headwind when you're running for president; an error of that magnitude will exact a political price. Would anyone be surprised if voters say that they've had enough?" - Byron York, NRO.
More and more Republicans are willing to call this war what it is--a mistake?

May 26, 2008

Memorial day

Some 4,081 gone in Iraq, plus those from Afghanistan, and those servicemen and women who will suffer from this war for the rest of their lives.

****

Politico.com has an interesting take on the Hillary RFK comments (echoing what Steve said in our comments) about her thoughtless words being taken out of context.

I see their point, but really felt horrible when I heard what she said. All of the "timeline" defense from Clinton misses the point that she still raised (several times) the specter of assassination when people are scared of that in this race to begin with.

Clinton's defenders have much to be angry for in this race, or at least some. They can bitch legitimately about the sexist coverage, and the often biased coverage that Clinton received (though the bias obviously also went her way at times, and there was also substantial racism in this race). But this was her fault. She has handled this race pretty badly for the last few months, and an aside (no matter the emphasis on timeline) about political assassination in this race was over the line.

*****

And all you need to know about how insensitive her remarks were is this unbelievable clip from Fox where two people joke about assassinating Obama
"and now we have what ... uh...some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Osama ...uh..um..Obama [after being prompted by the FNC anchor]....well both if we could [laughing]"
Truly unbelievable.

****

Have a good Memorial Day.

May 24, 2008

Hillary and her mouth

God knows we all say things we regret later. And I feel for those in the public eye, because they are so vulnerable to the sound-bite and the error. But when Hillary evoked the assassination of RFK in 1968 to justify staying in the race, she may have just pushed herself out of the race. It is just so damn thoughtless. From what I have read, she has mentioned this previously, so it isn't just an innocent slip. I know she is not wishing for something bad to happen to Obama, but this was over the line. And her non-apology apology, anytime someone says, "if someone was offended, I am sorry" you know they are not really very sorry.

Sullivan had this to say:
She's been waiting for Obama to implode. Instead, she just has.
Time for the super delegates to stand up and finish this.

May 23, 2008

Damn cell phone users

Yesterday, my friend Mary and I were forced to listen to an amazingly loud woman talk on her cell phone. Loud enough that it drove us outside. Loud enough that I wanted very much to say something to her. Unbelievably loud and unbelievably inconsiderate.

Perhaps I need to go here and print out some of these:

John McCain repudiates Parsley too

Los Angeles Times:
"Later in the day, McCain told the Associated Press that he also repudiated the support of Rod Parsley, an Ohio preacher who has sharply criticized Islam and called the religion inherently violent. 'I believe there is no place for that kind of dialogue in America,' McCain said."
McCain must have been sitting in an awkward place for sometime. He had to know something about these wackjobs when he recruited their endorsement.
I didn't attend their church for 20 years, and I'm not a member of their church. I received their endorsement, which did not mean that I endorsed their views."
But that sounds like they just endorsed him out of the blue, and that isn't accurate. He had to know and he went after their support.

Waiting to reject them suggests that he was torn politically. He fears losing too many on the right--not that they will vote for Obama, but they might stay home--and yet also had to know he would lose people in the middle by recruiting Islamophobic crazies.

May 22, 2008

How to defend torture

You have to create an inhuman enemy, argues Daniel Larison:
"two different rhetorical tactics are employed. First, you will have the outright denial that torture is taking place (“we don’t torture,” Mr. Bush has said on more than one occasion) and then grudging acknowledgements that “extreme” measures have been used (“enhanced interrogation techniques”), and finally a justification of the actual inflicting of mental and physical duress on detainees. Mr. Bush’s cheerleaders on blogs and radio are quite explicit about this. Blogger Dean Barnett once wrote, “The torture opponents’ entire premise rests on the erroneous notion that one can successfully wage war without cruelty and savagery. I wish they were right. But they’re not.” Challenged by one of his listeners that he supported torture in recent weeks, radio host Michael Medved unflinchingly agreed that he did. What is first wrapped in euphemisms is then openly defended and even celebrated as necessary. Central to this is the denial of the rationality of the enemy, which is tantamount to a denial of their humanity."


McCain's pastor problems

First, CNN is reporting that John McCain has rejected John Hagee's endorsement. It only took, what? 4 months or so? Looks like he did so right about the same time that John Hagee took back his endorsement, citing critics who were "misrepresenting" his words. No, sorry, Mr. Hagee. You are just as batshit crazy as we think.

Now the clock is ticking on the other batshit crazy pastor--Rod Parsley. McCain's campaign says that he only met with Parsley one time before accepting his endorsement, so, naturally, we can't hold him accountable for the guy's radical views on destroying Islam, right? As Yglesias says
But of course anti-Muslim bigotry has a large constituency in the United States so it's not a political weakness to be affiliated with it. Similarly, it's true that having a president who likes to associate himself with anti-Muslim bigotry would be a disaster for American foreign policy and national security, but since the essence of McCain's foreign policy vision is that he wants to maximize the number and duration of wars this won't actually be a problem for him.

May 21, 2008

Blech

More from crazy nutjob John Hagee:
"John Hagee, the controversial evangelical leader and endorser of Sen. John McCain, argued in a late 1990s sermon that the Nazis had operated on God's behalf to chase the Jews from Europe and shepherd them to Palestine. According to the Reverend, Adolph Hitler was a 'hunter,' sent by God, who was tasked with expediting God's will of having the Jews re-establish a state of Israel.

Going in and out of biblical verse, Hagee preached: ''And they the hunters should hunt them,' that will be the Jews. 'From every mountain and from every hill and from out of the holes of the rocks.' If that doesn't describe what Hitler did in the holocaust you can't see that.'"

May 20, 2008

A disturbing trend

Feministing notes that women (especially Black women) represent the fastest growing segment of the Prison population, 80% of which are in for non-violent drug offenses.

Then this:
The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.

Maybe we need to rethink what our prisons are for. I have long held that our education and penal system suffer from the same problem--we don't have a clear idea what we are trying to achieve with either.

I think I love the bouzouki

Saw people play it twice this week, and I think it is such a cool sound. Talked to Kieran Kane after the show Sunday evening and he said it was tuned just like the mandolin, only an octave lower.

Here are a couple of youtube videos featuring the bouzouki. Enjoy:




May 19, 2008

Nice company

One of Sully's readers noted a new low:
"Last night I was clicking back and forth between the Mets/Yankees game The Empire Strikes Back on cable. I hadn't watched Empire in a long time. There's a scene where Darth Vader tortures Han Solo (which occurs off-screen, but Han's screams are audible). Han is then dumped into the room with Lando and Pricess Leia, and the Imperial thug says contemptuously, 'Don’t worry. He won't be permanently damaged.' So include Darth Vader -- Darth fucking Vader -- among the prestigious company we're keeping with our sure-it-hurts-like-hell-but-if-it-doesn't-leave-a-mark-it -ain't-torture approach to interrogation."

Christian conservatives?

What the hell is this?:
"Columbus — Georgia Republican Party chairwoman Sue Everhart said Saturday that the party's presumed presidential nominee has a lot in common with Jesus Christ.

'John McCain is kind of like Jesus Christ on the cross,' Everhart said as she began the second day of the state GOP convention. 'He never denounced God, either.'

Everhart was praising McCain for never denouncing the United States while he was being tortured as a prisoner of war in Vietnam.

'I'm not trying to compare John McCain to Jesus Christ, I'm looking at the pain that was there,' she said."

This is what combining faith and politics has given us.

****

Speaking of conservative Christianity, I want to build on a subject raised in recent comments and something we have discussed peripherally on the blog for a long time. Every so often, a conservative Christian comes in here and suggests that people who believe evolution, or those who don't believe the Bible is divinely inspired, or those who aren't Christian at all--don't have any morals, or don't have the ability to form morality. That, according to many conservatives, comes alone from God.

So, how do conservative Christians learn their morality? I will concede that some of them are written down in the Bible. Not killing, not stealing, etc.

But what about those things not addressed directly in the Bible? Racism? Environmental destruction? Or even those things that are addressed? Taking care of the poor, the contrast between the wealthy and the poor, etc. How do conservative Christians understand those things?

And I am not being snide here. I really want to understand.