I read this entry that argues that the largest growing demographic in America is the non-Christian portion, and I cheered!
That felt a little weird and still does for a kid who grew up Baptist. Cheering for the heathens (joking) to win seems to be like cheering against my home team. I also wonder am I cheering for something that in a few years I will really regret? Is the law of unintended consequences something I will recall later?
So, why would I be cheering that non-Christians are growing at a rate faster than Christians?
Could it be that the most prominent examples of my faith are so horrible? D. James Kennedy? And this ass calls Tom Delay a Christian Statesman? Or George W. Bush who says that his faith is "very important" and that Jesus is his favorite political philosopher while mocking a condemned woman and planting racist rumors about political opponents?
Those are great examples, but I had two from today alone. First was Phylis Schafly "reviewing" a book that was critical of liberal intellectuals. It has "moron" in the title--something Schafly loved--and attacked such low hanging fruit as Alfred Kinsey and Peter Singer. Schafly lumps them in with all liberals and that allows her to call all of us morons. She said that their problem was that their ideology clouded their judgement. Hmm. Wonder if she has anything like a fucking log in her eye? Hmm?
I have written about her before, but she is one of the least likable and least credible voices on the right. No wonder I prefer avowed athiests to her.
But that wasn't all. I then heard about a court case in Oregon where the state court said that counties could not issue gay marriage licenses. (See, if I was an ass like Dobson, I would be calling for their impeachment or death, but I am not). The decision was valid on the law--Oregon among numerous states passed anti-gay legislation. I can see how the court made that decision.
The problem is that real people exist in this context. Real people have real kids and have real health issues that are imperiled with such legislation. Real mothers cannot be sure that if they were to die, their partner would have legal access to their kids. Or real people know that if they are in ICU, their loved one--their most loved person--could be kept out. Say what you will about gay people, but they are people, and those who have formed lasting relationships should be respected.
But that is really not the main thrust of my anti-Christian rant. The same "family values" coalition (which reminds me of the Ladies of the Law and Order league in John Ford's Stagecoach) basked in the glory of the decision (which of course, went against the conservative love for local rule, but that is besides the point too). They then talked about their next task, to deny civil unions. Civil unions, would, with all their problems, provide some of the legal solution to the healthcare and childcare issues I talked about above. Conservative Christians talk about "hating the sin" but "loving the sinner," but these laws are going to cost real people real pain. Conservative Christians really want all gay people to be straight. They want to wave a wand and have everyone be like them.
I know too many gay people to not be chilled by this. I think conservative christians do too. They all have gay people in their family somewhere. They all have friends that they don't realize are gay, or who have gay kids. They really just wish we could go back to a time when those gay people would crawl back into a closet, marry a beard and act like all the Baptists.
Any wonder I am inclined to cheer for the "heathens?"
6 comments:
Streak, A certain type of "Christian" has ruined the term for the rest of us. Where is the love of God in what these people believe? I applaud the growth in the numbers of individuals who are seeking and finding God as faithful non-Christians, but I also think it is time for progressive Christians to stand up for what we believe to be God's will for us, i.e. that we are liberated by his Grace to be who they are and to be all that we can be. God loves us all. Jesus taught unconditional love. He WAS Unconditional Love Incarnate. Love is love and should be cherished in all circumstances. We need to make these the dominant messages associated with Christianity, not all this judgemental stuff. You want to talk about culture wars, this is the mother of them all. It is time that we rise up and take back our faith! GG
Maybe you're just hoping for some balance? A return to time where Christians had to be humble in their approach to spreading their message? Where they can't just grab the cudgel of the state and whack people over the head with it?
Yeah, I think balance and reason are things I am hoping for. As Leighton and I have run into over at Carlos's blog, so many Christians think they have a corner on morality, yet their own formation of morality is rather fuzzy. It is as if it is so externalized on this book of ancient wisdom that they reject the ability for good moral people of all backgrounds to make good decisions.
You said, "So, why would I be cheering that non-Christians are growing at a rate faster than Christians?"
Could it be because you are so focused on the failures of men and women, especially of those who call themseves Christians, that you no longer can see or care about God’s purpose in sending Jesus Christ to redeem mankind?
Anonymous said: "Could it be because you are so focused on the failures of men and women, especially of those who call themseves Christians, that you no longer can see or care about God’s purpose in sending Jesus Christ to redeem mankind?"
There is a lot here. Of course, part of it is that my focus here is really the people who claim to represent Christ--not Christ himself. I am trying to call attention to those who do damage to the faith, and wondering why other Christians don't also call them out.
Do I care? That was a little snippy, though probably deserved given my post. I do care, and do think that Christianity offers tremendous hope to humanity. I just don't see much of that in the prominent institution of the church.
In fact, I would add, that really was the point of my post. I am not really cheering against Christianity, or against Christ. I am annoyed to the point of tears with what passes for Christianity in the public sphere. To paraphrase my friend JWS, doesn't this stuff bother you too? If not, then why? Are you really comfortable with Tom Delay, Roy Moore and D. James Kennedy representing the dominant image of your faith in the public square today?
Very nice. Keep up the good work.
Post a Comment